Excerpts from Class Discussion and Questions to Share On injustice and the fair treatment of the poor and marginalized purposed by the Covenant Law of Exodus and Deuteronomy:
“…Professor and Pleins (in a way) and Catherine mentioned, and a straight-on reading of the Covenant Code clearly states, that God himself is the giver of the law, and the ruler of the people. God is the King and the judge, over the people, and promises protection and well-being for all when there is obedience in the land (the Deuteronomical Code gives a series of blessings for obedience of God’s good care taking of the people and curses that come when disobedience happens, the poor are neglected, God is forgotten, the covenant violated). I’ve seen too much of my own human heart to even think I could manage such a just or equally-minded living given to my own devices. If someone owes a debt to me, what on earth would provoke me to forgive them of it so completely without some knowledge of the good and forgiving nature of God, who gave me breath, redeemed me from my own slavery to addiction, and to who I owe my existence? A glance in any direction of the globe I think would confirm that I’m not the only one who has trouble at such a way of selfless inclusion that is prescribed to the Ancient Israelites under the Covenant.
My question is whether true justice will ever be able to operate in society - large or small - secular or sacred - without the same foundational assumption as the Living God is Sovereign ruler, appealing to Him for guidance, and a core understanding of the value of each human life - is possible at all? Even the well-wishing attempts go crooked down the road, as pointed out in the intentions of things like “No Child Left Behind” and some aspects of the Social Security system… that end up hurting instead of helping.
That came out fatalistic, and I don’t mean it to be at all. But man, a glance at any society under the sun, and it’s quite apparent we need a Savior to help us do this thing. I get hesitant when politicians, lawmakers and businesses make plans to fix it all, when the issues of the great macrocosm injustice issues of society must first be managed in the microcosm of the human heart.
But perhaps that is what we are doing here, in essence, together in this course: Right thinking as a prerequisite and supportive companion to right doing. And it’s quite beautiful to be a part of. “
Excerpts from Class Discussion and Questions to Share
On injustice and the fair treatment of the poor and marginalized purposed by the Covenant Law of Exodus and Deuteronomy:
“…Professor and Pleins (in a way) and Catherine mentioned, and a straight-on reading of the Covenant Code clearly states, that God himself is the giver of the law, and the ruler of the people. God is the King and the judge, over the people, and promises protection and well-being for all when there is obedience in the land (the Deuteronomical Code gives a series of blessings for obedience of God’s good care taking of the people and curses that come when disobedience happens, the poor are neglected, God is forgotten, the covenant violated). I’ve seen too much of my own human heart to even think I could manage such a just or equally-minded living given to my own devices. If someone owes a debt to me, what on earth would provoke me to forgive them of it so completely without some knowledge of the good and forgiving nature of God, who gave me breath, redeemed me from my own slavery to addiction, and to who I owe my existence? A glance in any direction of the globe I think would confirm that I’m not the only one who has trouble at such a way of selfless inclusion that is prescribed to the Ancient Israelites under the Covenant.
My question is whether true justice will ever be able to operate in society - large or small - secular or sacred - without the same foundational assumption as the Living God is Sovereign ruler, appealing to Him for guidance, and a core understanding of the value of each human life - is possible at all? Even the well-wishing attempts go crooked down the road, as pointed out in the intentions of things like “No Child Left Behind” and some aspects of the Social Security system… that end up hurting instead of helping.
That came out fatalistic, and I don’t mean it to be at all. But man, a glance at any society under the sun, and it’s quite apparent we need a Savior to help us do this thing. I get hesitant when politicians, lawmakers and businesses make plans to fix it all, when the issues of the great macrocosm injustice issues of society must first be managed in the microcosm of the human heart.
But perhaps that is what we are doing here, in essence, together in this course: Right thinking as a prerequisite and supportive companion to right doing. And it’s quite beautiful to be a part of. “